September 02, 2004, 10:15 p.m, National
Review Online
Follow the Leader:
Israel and Thailand set an example by
arming teachers.
Islamist terrorists in Beslan, Russia, are
currently holding hundreds of children hostage, threatening to
execute them. No one knows how this horrible situation will end; but
we do know that it could have been prevented. Decades ago, Israel
adopted a policy that swiftly ended terrorist attacks against
schools. Earlier this year, Thailand adopted a similar approach. It
is politically incorrect, but it does have the advantage of saving
the lives of children and teachers. The policy? Encourage teachers
to carry firearms.
Muslim extremists in Thailand’s southern provinces of Narathiwat,
Yala, and Pattani have been carrying out a terrorist campaign,
seeking to create an Islamic state independent of Thailand, whose
population is predominantly Buddhist.
Most teachers are Buddhists, and they have been a key target of
the terrorists, who have also perpetrated arsons against dozens of
schools.
As reported by the Associated Press (“Thailand allows teachers in
restive south to carry guns for protection”) on April 27, 2004,
“Interior Minister Bhokin Bhalakula ordered provincial governors to
give teachers licenses to buy guns if they want to even though it
would mean bringing firearms into the classrooms when the region's
925 schools reopen May 17 after two months of summer holiday.”
The A.P. article explained: “Pairat Wihakarat, the president of a
teachers’ union in the three provinces, said more than 1,700
teachers have already asked for transfers to safer areas. Those who
are willing to stay want to carry guns to protect themselves, he
said.”
Gun-control laws in Thailand are extremely strict, and are being
tightened even more because of three school shootings (perpetrated
by students) that took place in a single week in June 2003. Two
students were killed.
But though Thailand’s government is extremely hostile to gun
ownership in general, it has recognized that teachers ought to be
able to safeguard their students and themselves.
Will Thailand’s new strategy work? It did in Israel, as David
Schiller detailed in an interview with
Jews for the
Preservation of Firearms Ownership. Schiller was born in West
Germany and moved to Israel, where he served in the military as a
weapons specialist. He later returned to Germany, and was hired as a
counterterrorism expert by the Berlin police office, as well as by
police forces of other German cities. For a while he worked in the
terrorism research office of the RAND
corporation, and for several years he published a German gun
magazine.
Schiller recalls that Palestine Liberation Organization attacks
on Israeli schools began during Passover 1974. The first attack was
aimed at a school in Galilee. When the PLO terrorists found that it
was closed because of Passover weekend, they murdered several people
in a nearby apartment building.
Then, on May 15, 1974, in Maalot:
Three PLO gunmen, after making their way through the border fence,
first shot up a van load full of workers returning from a tobacco
factory (incidentally these people happened to be Galilee Arabs,
not Jews), then they entered the school compound of Maalot. First
they murdered the housekeeper, his wife and one of their kids,
then they took a whole group of nearly 100 kids and their teachers
hostage. These were staying overnight at the school, as they were
on a hiking trip. In the end, the deadline ran out, and the army’s
special unit assaulted the building. During the rescue attempt,
the gunmen blew their explosive charges and sprayed the kids with
machine-gun fire. 25 people died, 66 wounded.
Israel at the time had some strict gun laws, left over from the
days of British colonialism, when the British rulers tried to
prevent the Jews from owning guns.
After vigorous debate, the government began allowing army
reservists to keep their weapons with them. Handgun carry permits
were given to any Israeli with a clean record who lived in the most
dangerous areas: Judea, Samaria, and Gaza.
All over Israel, guns became pervasive in the schools:
Teachers and kindergarten nurses now started to carry guns,
schools were protected by parents (and often grandpas) guarding
them in voluntary shifts. No school group went on a hike or trip
without armed guards. The Police involved the citizens in a
voluntary civil guard project “Mishmar Esrachi,” which even had
its own sniper teams. The Army’s Youth Group program, “Gadna”,
trained 15 to 16-year-old kids in gun safety and guard procedures
and the older high-school boys got involved with the Mishmar
Esrachi. During one noted incident, the “Herzliyah Bus massacre”
(March ’78, hijacking of a bus, 37 dead, 76 wounded), these
youngsters were involved in the overall security measures in which
the whole area between North Tel Aviv and the resort town of
Herzlyiah was blocked off, manning roadblocks with the police,
guarding schools kindergartens, etc.
After a while, “When the message got around to the PLO groups and
a couple infiltration attempts failed, the attacks against schools
ceased.”
This is not to say that Palestinian terrorists never target
schools. In late May 2002, an Israeli teacher shot a suicide
terrorist before he could harm anyone.
On May 31, 2002, as
reported by
Israel National News, a terrorist threw a grenade and began shooting
at a kindergarten in Shavei Shomron. Then, instead of closing in on
the children, he abruptly fled the kindergarten and began shooting
up the nearby neighborhood. Apparently he realized that the
kindergarten was sure to have armed adults, and that he could not
stay at the school long enough to make sure he actually murdered
someone.
Unfortunately for the terrorist, “David Elbaz, owner of the local
mini-market, gave chase and killed him with gunshots. In addition to
several grenades and the weapon the terrorist carried on him,
security sweeps revealed several explosive devices that he had
intended to detonate during the thwarted attack.”
People can spend months and years studying the “root causes” of
terrorism, and pondering the merits of the grievances of Islamic
terrorists in Malaysia, Israel, and Russia. But it’s fair to say
that schoolchildren and teachers are not legitimate targets even of
people who have legitimate grievances.
No one knows if civilized nations will ever eliminate the root
causes of terrorism. But we do know that terrorist attacks on
schools and schoolchildren could be almost completely eliminated in
a very short time — if every nation at risk of terrorist attacks on
schools began following the lead of Thailand and Israel.
Adults have a duty to protect children. In Beslan at this very
moment, seven people are dead, and hundreds more are in deadly
peril, because the teachers lacked the tools to stop the evildoers.
If we are really serious about gun laws that protect “the children,”
then it seems clear that — whatever other gun laws a society adopts
— every civilized nation at risk of terrorist attack ought to ensure
that armed teachers can protect innocent children.
— David Kopel is research director of the
Independence Institute.
|